Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zsolt Pölöskei (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete (G5) – creation by a sock of a banned user. –MuZemike 23:23, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Zsolt Pölöskei (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence that this player has played professional football to satisfy requirements of WP:NSPORTS or WP:GNG. Information on Liverpool appearances incorrect. Cannot find evidence of him at MTK at present on their official website, no sources for loan move to Gyori. Details included on appearances and quotes as not sourced Zanoni (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - His Liverpool stats are false as he never made an appearance. Therefore it is reasonable to assume that if no source corroborates him turning out for MTK that those statistics are also false and that he has n fact never played professional football.--EchetusXe 19:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The MTK stats are false too (see [1]). No evidence this article passes any of our notability guidelines. Jogurney (talk) 19:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - still fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 14:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.